Fiscal Federalism in the UK: How Free is Local Government?
نویسنده
چکیده
points z z The UK system of government is one of the most centralized in the developed world. As a result, local governments have very few powers when it comes to tax regulation, while their policy choices are constrained by tightly controlled expenditure mandates. z z Nevertheless, there is evidence that local party control does matter. A switch from Conservative to Labour Party control usually leads to increases in council employment, expenditure and taxes for unitary and upper-tier councils. However, this is not the case for district councils, probably because party differences often materialize over education and social services spending. z z Performance management schemes, in particular the Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA), do appear to affect both voter perceptions of local government and its behaviour, but they can have unintended consequences. Overall, such schemes have increased local government spending and taxation, but generally have failed to improve efficiency in the use of resources. z z Incentive schemes like CPA often fail to stimulate higher local government efficiency because they are too output-oriented; incentive schemes should be designed to place substantial emphasis on efficiency, and not just reward output. z z Overall, the evidence suggests that local government in the UK is too tightly controlled from the centre and that the country would benefit from a degree of decentralization.
منابع مشابه
Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t JEL classification: H77 H11 H71 R11 R58 Keywords: Fiscal federalism State and local taxation Intergovernmental relations Revenue First generation fiscal federalism (FGFF) studies the performance of decentralized systems under the assumption of benevolent social planners. Second generation fiscal federalism (SGFF) studies performance based on the fiscal and ...
متن کاملFiscal Decentralization in China and India: Competitive, Cooperative or Market Preserving Federalism?
This paper provides a comparative assessment of fiscal decentralization in China and India, including the standard components of expenditure and revenue assignments and institutions for intergovernmental transfers, as well as the nature of sub-national authorities over general economic activity. In particular, the case of China, where town and village enterprises have been very active, is contr...
متن کاملState Finances in India
This paper provides a self-contained overview of the present problems of state finances in India. It begins with an overview of historical evolution and current institutional structures, including economic, political, administrative and fiscal aspects of India’s federal system. The paper then reviews the current situation of India’s state government finances, going on to consider various develo...
متن کاملState finances in India: A case for systemic reform
This paper provides a self-contained overview of the present problems of state finances in India. It begins with an overview of historical evolution and current institutional structures, including economic, political, administrative and fiscal aspects of India’s federal system. The paper then reviews the current situation of India’s state government finances, going on to consider various develo...
متن کاملFiscal Decentralization in China and India:
This paper provides a comparative assessment of fiscal decentralization in China and India, including the standard components of expenditure and revenue assignments and institutions for intergovernmental transfers, as well as the nature of subnational authorities over general economic activity. In particular, the case of China, where town and village enterprises have been very active, is contra...
متن کامل